Back to curriculum
Domain

Electrophysiology & Devices

Modules

Pacemaker Indications & Modes

DDD vs. VVI vs. CRT — physiologic pacing when possible.

Why Dyssynchrony Impairs Cardiac Function

In left bundle branch block or right ventricular apical pacing, ventricular activation no longer proceeds through the rapid His-Purkinje network but instead spreads slowly, cell-to-cell, from a single point of earliest activation. This produces mechanical dyssynchrony, in which some segments contract before others are ready, wasting energy, reducing stroke volume, and over time driving adverse remodeling — sometimes called pacing-induced cardiomyopathy when caused by chronic right ventricular pacing. Cardiac resynchronization therapy restores near-simultaneous activation of the septum and lateral wall by pacing both (or by pacing the conduction system directly), improving coordinated contraction and promoting reverse remodeling.

Indications

Chest X-ray of a dual-chamber pacemaker with right atrial and right ventricular leads (Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0)Symptomatic SND, third-degree/high-grade AVB, symptomatic Mobitz II, alternating BBB, chronotropic incompetence. Conduction system pacing (His-bundle, LBBAP) increasingly preferred over RV pacing.

Modes (NASPE/BPEG)

IChamberpacedA / V / DIIChambersensedA / V / DIIIResponseI / T / DCommon modesDDD — dual pace,dual sense, bothVVI — singlechamber, inhibitedFirst letter: chamber paced. Second: chamber sensed. Third: response (I=inhibit, T=trigger, D=dual). DDD, VVI, AAI, DDI.

CRT

Class I: HFrEF LVEF ≤35% on GDMT, LBBB, QRS ≥150 ms. Class IIa: QRS 120–149 with LBBB, or ≥150 non-LBBB. Response ~65%. Non-responders: scar in target region, non-LBBB, severe RV dysfunction.

Conduction System Pacing

His bundle and left bundle branch area pacing preserve physiologic ventricular activation more closely than conventional right ventricular apical pacing, reducing the risk of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy in patients expected to need a high percentage of ventricular pacing. Conventional RV pacing remains reasonable for patients with infrequent expected pacing burden.
Clinical pearls
·
Conduction system pacing (LBB area pacing) preserves LV synchrony and may replace CRT in some populations — LBBP-RESYNC showed non-inferiority.
·
A dual-chamber pacemaker in AF with high burden of ventricular pacing causes pacing-induced cardiomyopathy — consider CRT or CSP upgrade.
·
CRT is guideline-indicated primarily for LVEF ≤35%, LBBB with QRS ≥150 ms, and NYHA II-IV symptoms despite GDMT, with the greatest benefit seen in true LBBB morphology.
·
Biventricular pacing requires near-100% capture to achieve its benefit; intrinsic conduction competing with paced beats can blunt or negate CRT response.
·
His bundle pacing tends to have higher and rising capture thresholds and more frequent lead revisions than left bundle branch area pacing, now the more commonly used conduction system pacing strategy.
Related guidelines